Sign in to save

Bookmark this page so you can find it later.

Sign in to save

Bookmark this page so you can find it later.

Plessy v. Ferguson was an 1896 Supreme Court case that shaped American law and society for more than half a century. It began when Homer Plessy, a Black man under Louisiana law, challenged a state law requiring separate railroad cars for Black and White passengers.

The Court ruled that racial segregation did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment as long as separate facilities were considered equal. This decision gave constitutional approval to segregation and helped strengthen Jim Crow laws across the United States.

The case mattered because it showed how constitutional interpretation can either protect rights or limit them. The majority said separation by race was not the same as legal inequality, but Justice John Marshall Harlan strongly disagreed. Harlan argued that the Constitution is color-blind and that the ruling would damage civil rights.

The separate-but-equal doctrine remained in force until later cases, especially Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, rejected it in public education.

Key Facts

  • Plessy v. Ferguson was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1896.
  • The case challenged Louisiana's Separate Car Act, which required racially separate railroad cars.
  • The Supreme Court upheld segregation by a 7 to 1 vote.
  • The ruling created the separate-but-equal doctrine, allowing segregation if facilities were claimed to be equal.
  • Justice John Marshall Harlan wrote the famous dissent arguing that the Constitution is color-blind.
  • Brown v. Board of Education in 1954 rejected separate-but-equal in public schools.

Vocabulary

Segregation
Segregation is the forced separation of people by race or another identity in public or private life.
Fourteenth Amendment
The Fourteenth Amendment guarantees equal protection of the laws and due process to people in the United States.
Separate-but-equal
Separate-but-equal was the legal doctrine claiming that racially separate facilities were constitutional if they were supposedly equal.
Dissenting opinion
A dissenting opinion is a written explanation by a judge who disagrees with the court's majority decision.
Jim Crow laws
Jim Crow laws were state and local laws that enforced racial segregation, especially in the American South.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Saying Plessy v. Ferguson ended segregation is wrong because the decision actually upheld segregation and strengthened Jim Crow laws.
  • Calling the ruling unanimous is wrong because Justice Harlan dissented from the majority opinion.
  • Assuming separate facilities were truly equal is wrong because segregation usually produced unequal resources, treatment, and political power.
  • Confusing Plessy v. Ferguson with Brown v. Board of Education is wrong because Plessy approved separate-but-equal, while Brown rejected it in public education.

Practice Questions

  1. 1 The Supreme Court vote in Plessy v. Ferguson was 7 to 1. What fraction of the participating justices supported the majority ruling, and what percentage is that?
  2. 2 Plessy v. Ferguson was decided in 1896, and Brown v. Board of Education was decided in 1954. How many years passed between the two decisions?
  3. 3 Explain why Justice Harlan's dissent argued that segregation was inconsistent with the Fourteenth Amendment, even though the majority claimed separate facilities could be equal.