This cheat sheet covers three special factoring patterns that appear often in Algebra 1 and Algebra 2: difference of squares, sum of cubes, and difference of cubes. Students need these patterns because they make many polynomial expressions faster to factor and simplify. Recognizing the structure of an expression helps avoid long trial-and-error factoring.
These identities are also useful when solving equations, simplifying rational expressions, and preparing for higher algebra.
Key Facts
- The difference of squares pattern is .
- A difference of squares must have two perfect square terms separated by subtraction, such as .
- The sum of cubes pattern is .
- The difference of cubes pattern is .
- For cubes, the binomial factor uses the same sign as the original expression: gives and gives .
- For cubes, the trinomial signs follow the pattern SOAP: Same sign, Opposite sign, Always Positive.
- Always check for a greatest common factor first, such as .
- You can verify any factoring identity by multiplying the factors back together to get the original expression.
Vocabulary
- Difference of Squares
- A factoring pattern for subtracting two perfect squares, written as .
- Sum of Cubes
- A factoring pattern for adding two perfect cubes, written as .
- Difference of Cubes
- A factoring pattern for subtracting two perfect cubes, written as .
- Perfect Square
- A number or expression that can be written as something squared, such as or .
- Perfect Cube
- A number or expression that can be written as something cubed, such as or .
- Greatest Common Factor
- The largest factor shared by all terms in an expression, often factored out before using special patterns.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Factoring as is wrong because the difference of squares pattern only works for subtraction, not addition.
- Using the wrong signs in a cube formula is wrong because factors as , while factors as .
- Forgetting to find the greatest common factor first can leave the expression only partly factored, such as writing without first factoring .
- Mistaking a non-perfect cube for a cube pattern is wrong because terms like are not perfect cubes unless every factor fits a cube form.
- Dropping variables or exponents during substitution is wrong because equals , not .
Practice Questions
- 1 Factor completely: .
- 2 Factor completely: .
- 3 Factor completely: .
- 4 Explain why cannot be factored using the difference of squares pattern over the real numbers.